Sunday, 25 October 2015

6- Textual analysis: exploitation and the male gaze

MUSIC VIDEOS are continuing to over-sexualise and demean young women, female empowerment campaigners have said as they launch a campaign for better protection. End Violence Against Women (EVAW) Coalition, Imkaan and OBJECT are now working together to call for age restrictions on music videos whether they are sold in shops or viewed online. It follows growing concern that young female artists like Rihanna and Miley Cyrus are baring more and more flesh to maintain their popularity. The uncensored version of male singer Robin Thicke’s Blurred Lines video – which used naked women while the men stayed fully clothed – was removed from YouTube for being “inappropriate”, and banned worldwide after causing upset.
Many music videos sexualizing women and creating the illusion of a woman as a sexual object, almost like a prop of the music videos. These music videos are spread across all genres of music including hip hop, pop, rock and country. 
I think we can only judge the intent of the music video to a certain extent. I as a woman who feels very strongly about the empowerment of women find it quite difficult sometimes to distinguish between the fine line of exploitation and empowerment. I struggle to understand the artists intentions when it comes down to the meaning of the music video, especially when it comes to female artists. I think this is tricky to understand because in some cases such as many of the Britney spears videos we cannot tell which ones are Britney representing women as strong and unafraid to show their body or are her trying to conform to expectations and stereotypical roles of women for audiences and within the music industry. 
For example this mid shot of 50 cent surrounded by three women in his music video in da club, in a way represents his mind set as an artist and what ideals he wants to put out there. The use of a mid shot allows us to see most things in the shot close enough to see everything in detail but not too close so we could not see all the elements. In this shot he has chosen to put the women in bikinis showing off their body. However i feel like the purpose of this shot was not too give power to the women as they are laying on him and he is in the front of the shot, presenting them as props in the background. Instead he is probably trying to attract male views by using the women as sexual objects. 

Laura Mulvey wrote a theory called the male gaze in 1975 before most of these music videos were created. It presented the question of are women filmed differently in music videos to women? are women represented as weak and sexual objects and are men presented and filmed at angles and in ways that makes them seem powerful and attractive too audiences? 
What are the expectations of female artists? and why do they have different expectations to their male counterparts? why has it become a role in society for women to be looked at in whatever way suits males and why is this being promoted and supported by some artists? and will the promotion of sexist attitudes effect women mentally and alter the way in which they perceive themselves and each other?
What is the gaze?

  • How men look at women.
  • How women look at themselves.
  • How women look at other women.

An example of a music video which could effect the way men look at women could be the pussycat dolls music video " buttons"  
This is a wide angle shot of a few seconds of the music video. Here the girls from the group are all in positions that could be seen as provocative to audiences. It creates the question do women use their bodies in order to be looked at by men and receive attention in music videos and the industry? However this could then become replicated in everyday life, every time a women is showing parts of her body will it be seen as provocative by people? and will this create further issues of men taking advantage of women or exploiting them because of something that is presented in a music video?

These are the main features of the male gaze theory

  1. The representation of women as a sexual fantasy and from a heterosexual male point of view.
  2. Scopophilia- the pleasure involved in looking at other peoples bodies.
  3. patriarchal society.
  4. objectification of female characters.
  5. Active male and passive female.
  6. men- controlling subjects.
  7. women as an image.
  8. men do the looking and the women are there to be looked at.
  9. needs of the male ego.
All these can apply to a number of music videos and open up the idea that society is creating dangerous environments for not only women but males and children also.

Acceptance of exploitation in music videos could lead to people thinking its okay to abuse and exploit women in everyday life. Here are a few shocking statistics that i found in relation to current sexual abuse.

  • 1 out of every 6 American women has been the victim of an attempted or completed rape in her lifetime
  • 17.7 million American women have been victims of attempted or completed rape.
  • 9 of every 10 rape victims were female in 2003.


attempted rape for women by race:
  • All women: 17.6%
  • White women: 17.7%
  • Black women: 18.8%
  • Asian Pacific Islander women: 6.8%
  • American Indian/Alaskan women: 34.1%
  • Mixed race women: 24.4%


  • Girls ages 16-19 are 4 times more likely than the general population to be victims of rape, attempted rape, or sexual assault.
These statistics really did shock me when reading around the subject. The role singers and performers have should be a positive one, represented through their music video. They have a responsibility and have the power to make the world a better place, its about time more stars use the advantage they have and encourage equality, safety and fairness in today's societies. 

Star theory


Thursday, 15 October 2015

Sunday, 27 September 2015

The top ten music videos of the summer

Here are the top ten music videos of the summer voted for by the public.
10:



9:


8:



7:


6:




5:
 

4:


3:




2:
 

1:

Sunday, 20 September 2015

Controversy in Music Videos

Recently we did some investigation into what kind of controversy appears in the media and why this controversy occurs.
We read an article called Video Games by Column. It discusses "the new gratuitously violent and nudity-fueled Rihanna video which set the internet alight with righteous indignation." According to Dorian Lynskey, that could have been the whole point.

The article and writer argues that Rihannas new video is a basic 'mini movie'. It starts to insinuate that when an artist resorts to creating a short film for a music video that "its time too quit", according to Nirvana/foo fighters star Dave Grohl. It summarises the music video. Rihanna kidnaps the accountants (played by Hanibal's Mads Mikkelsen) wife, tortures her, then kills the accountant and takes her money back.


He says "predictably, the internet unpacked the sexual and racial politics of the video... Whilst ignoring the fact that this is just the kind of thing pop stars do at a certain point in their careers." I think this is a really interesting point to pick up on, due to the fact the author is stereotyping and classifying. He's suggesting audiences are oblivious to faults of an artist but also categorizing all pop stars in to a category of "they get desperate they have to do something drastic." It becomes clear to readers that the authors issue stems with the way some pop stars present themselves and it wouldn't be the first time this has been said.

                                                                             

He also says "The 'event video' must be long, self regarding, hubristic and flamboyantly expensive." He insinuates Rihanna uses her video to present herself as a "no fuck giving badass but comes off as somewhat desperate." His opinion on the subject is pop artists use controversial music videos too get views and more notability.